#1 closed defect (wontfix)
QT/2 vs Freetype
| Reported by: | froloff | Owned by: | dmik |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | 3rdparty | Version: | |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
Freetype is a part of official QT distro. Is it possible to include it into QT/2 as well?
Change History (2)
comment:1 Changed 18 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 18 years ago by
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Do you mean Qt Version 4? Freetype is not a part of Qt Version 3. Anyway, I'm definitely planning to use Freetype/2 (system-wide Innotek Freetype/2 installation, to be exact) to finalize unicode support in Qt/2 Version 3. And currenty I see no benefits of including Freetype sources to Qt/2 Version 3 -- this would make sense only if we were drawing all text in widgets ourselves (i.e. not using relevant GPI calls). Probably we will use this approach, but only in a future Qt/2 Version 4 (in its Arthur subsystem -- but this needs to be investigated though).